Breast Augmentation Gallery

Case 1

This patient is a 18 year woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 400 cc smooth round high profile (style 20) implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar .  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 2

This 23 year old very athletic San Diego woman underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 350 cc smooth round high profile implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 1 year after breast surgery.

Case 3

This 22 year old woman from Las Vegas with mild breast and chest asymmetry underwent a silicone breast augmentation using a L sided 325 cc and right sided 350 cc smooth round high profile implant placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 3 months after surgery with improved shape and symmetry. Her areolar scars are already very well healed.

Case 4

This patient is a attractive female in her 20s who desired a natural increase in the size of her breasts. She underwent the sub-muscular placement of a 339 cc silicone breast implant (style 15) through a breast crease incision and is seen 4 months after undergoing her procedure.

Case 5

This patient is a 24 year old San Diego woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 400 cc smooth round high profile breast implants placed under the muscle and through breast crease incision.  She is seen here 2 months after surgery, already with an attractive result.

Case 6

This patient is a 38 year old San Diego mother of two who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 397 cc smooth round style 15 (moderate) breast implants placed under the muscle and through breast crease incision.  She is seen here 3 months after surgery.

Case 7

This patient underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 350 cc smooth round moderate plus implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 8

This patient is a 40 year old Asian woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 339 cc smooth round moderate plus implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 8 months after surgery.

Case 9

This patient is a 18 year old woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 425 cc smooth round style 20/high profile implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 2 months after surgery with already well healed scars and significant improvement in her overall volume and shape.

Case 10

This patient is a 33 year old mother from San Diego who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 475 cc smooth round high profile (style 20 Natrelle) implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  Despite a successful outcome, she felt that the implants were not large enough for her frame, and we elected to undergo the placement of 650 cc smooth round high profile (style 20 Natrelle) implants through the same incision. She is seen here 7 months after first procedure and 3 months after her  second surgery with an improved size and shape of her breasts.

Case 11

This patient is a 21 year old model from San Diego who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 400 cc smooth round high profile (style 20 Natrelle) implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 4 months after surgery with an improved size and shape of her breasts.

Case 12

This patient is a 24 year old San Diego woman who had breast asymmetry and wanted a moderate augmentation. She underwent the placement of 339 cc moderate (style 15) silicone implants under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 3 months after surgery with improvement in her asymmetry with the use of the same sized implants.

Case 13

This patient is a 31 year old San Diego woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 400 cc smooth round high profile breast implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 3 months after surgery with improved symmetry and breast shape.

Case 14

This patient is a 21 yo San Diego woman who wanted to improve the upper aspect of her breasts and increase her overall volume.  She underwent the placement of 425 cc high profile (style 20) implants through an areolar incision and is seen here 3 months after undergoing surgery.

Case 15

This patient is a 23 yo San Diego woman who wanted to improve the overall shape and volume of her breasts. She underwent the placement of 371 cc moderate profile (style 15) implants through an areolar incision and is seen here 3 months after undergoing surgery.

Case 16

This patient is a 23 yo San Diego woman who wanted to improve the overall shape, volume and mild asymmetry of her breasts. She underwent the placement of 371 cc moderate profile (style 15) implants through an areolar incision with a small peri-areolar lift on the patients right side (left) and is seen here 3 months with improved symmetry and nipple position on the breast.

Case 17

This patient is a 29 year old mother of two young children who is very fit and active. She complained of  a significant loss of breast volume and shape after pregnancy and breast feeding.  She underwent a silicone breast augmentation using a 371 cc moderate profile silicone implants placed under the muscle in conjunction with a crescent (above the areola) breast lift procedure.  She is seen here 4 months after surgery with significant improvement in her asymmetry with the use of differently sized implants.

Case 18

This patient is a 29 year old woman with noticeable breast asymmetry who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using a 550 cc high profile silicone implant on the right and a 600 cc smooth round high profile implant on the left placed under the muscle and through areolar incisions.  She is seen here 4 months after surgery with significant improvement in her asymmetry with the use of differently sized implants.

Case 19

This patient is a 23 year old San Diego woman who wanted a “round” look and larger volume increase to her breasts and underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 475 cc smooth round style 20/high profile implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 3 months after surgery with a dramatic improvement in her overall volume and shape.

Case 20

This patient is a 21 year old San Diego mother wanted a fuller and rounder shape to her breasts with an attractive  increase her upper breast volume.  She underwent the placement of 421 cc moderate profile (style 15) implants with a crescent breast life (above the areola) and is seen here 3 months after undergoing surgery.

Case 21

This patient is a 23 year old San Diego woman wanted a significantly fuller and rounder shape to her breasts with a substantial increase her overall volume.  She underwent the placement of 475 cc high profile (style 20) implants through a breast crease incision and is seen here 3 months after undergoing surgery.

Case 22

This patient is a 26 year old San Diego mother wanted to restore the lost volume and shape to her breasts after pregnancy and breast feeding. She desired a significantly fuller and rounder shape to her breasts, and underwent the placement of 450 cc high profile (style 20) implants through an areolar incision and is seen here over 3 months after undergoing surgery.

Case 23

This patient is a 24 year old San Diego woman who was interested in improving the volume and overall shape of her breasts. With limited overall breast growth, she desired a moderate increase in the volume while helping to overall reshape her breasts. She underwent the placement of 371 cc moderate profile (style 15) implants through a breast crease incision and is seen here over 4 months after undergoing surgery. Her scars will continue to fade over the course of the next 6-8 months.

Case 24

This patient is a 27 year old woman with both chest and breast asymmetry (best seen from the side view) who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using a 475 cc high profile silicone implant on the right and a 371 cc smooth round moderate profile implant on the left placed under the muscle and through breast crease incisions.  She is seen here 4 months after surgery with improvement in her asymmetry with the use of dramatically different sized implants.

Case 25

This patient is a 23 year old woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 350 cc smooth round style 20/high profile implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 3 months after surgery with well healed scars and significant improvement in her asymmetry.

Case 26

This patient is a 27 year old woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 397 cc smooth round style 15 implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 3 months after surgery with expectation that her mild scarring will continue to significantly improve.

Case 27

This patient is a 24 year old San Diego woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 371 cc smooth round moderate (style 15 Natrelle) implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She also underwent the correction of inverted nipples at the same time. She is seen here 4 months after surgery with a significant improvement in her shape and breast volume and maintenance of the nipple projection.

Case 28

This patient is a 26 year old San Diego woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 397 cc smooth round moderate (style 15 Natrelle) implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 4 months after surgery with a significant improvement in her shape and breast volume.

Case 29

This patient is a 18 year old San Diego woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 421cc smooth round moderate plus (style 15 Natrelle) implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 2 months after surgery.

Case 30

This patient is a 34 year old mother of two children from San Diego who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using modest, 286 cc volume style 15 Allergan silicone-gel implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 4 months after surgery. She also underwent a full tummy tuck and repair of an abdominal hernia at the same time – resulting in a full “mommy makeover.”

Case 31

This patient is a 21 year old woman from San Diego who wanted a full, round appearance of her breasts and underwent a silicone breast augmentation using asymmetric silicone implants with a 400 cc L and 450 cc R  placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 4 months after surgery very happy with her results.

Case 32

This patient is a 28 year old woman from Coronado who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 400 cc smooth round moderate plus implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 33

This patient is a 28 year old San Diego woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 350 cc smooth round moderate plus breast implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 34

This patient is a 28 year old San Diego woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 450 cc smooth round moderate plus implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 35

This 36 year old mother of three children underwent a saline breast augmentation using 500 cc smooth round moderate plus implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 36

This patient is a 42 year old woman from Rancho Santa Fe who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 350 cc smooth round moderate plus implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She also underwent liposuction to the abdomen and is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 37

This patient is a mother of two girls and wanted to restore the volume she lost with pregnancy and breast feeding. She underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 330 cc smooth round moderate plus implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 38

This patient is a 23 year old mother of one who wanted to restore her pre-pregnancy shape and underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 421 cc smooth round moderate profile implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 3 months after surgery.

Case 39

This patient is a 24 year old woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 350 cc smooth round moderate plus profile implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 40

This patient is a 32 year old San Diego woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 339 cc smooth round Style 15 implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 2.5 months after surgery.

Case 41

This patient is a 26 year old woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 450 cc smooth round high profile implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 42

This patient is a 41 year old woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 350 cc smooth round moderate plus  profile implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 1 year after surgery.

Case 43

This patient is a 36 year old woman who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 397 cc smooth round moderate profile (style 15) implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 3 months after her surgery and very happy with the new change to her breast size and shape.

Case 44

This patient is a 21 year old woman from San Diego who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 375 cc smooth round moderate plus profile implants placed under the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 45

This patient is a 20 year old student who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 325 cc smooth round moderate plus profile implants placed under the muscle and through breast crease incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 46

This patient is a 42 year old woman who desired and underwent a modest silicone breast augmentation using 300 cc smooth round moderate plus implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 47

This patient is a 27 year old woman who desired larger breasts and underwent a saline breast augmentation using 330 cc (filled to 350 cc) smooth round moderate plus profile implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 48

This patient is a 38 year old mother who underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 300 cc smooth round moderate plus implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 1 year after surgery.

Case 49

This patient is a 50 year old mother of three children who desired larger breasts and underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 375 cc smooth round moderate plus profile implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 50

This patient is a 24 year old woman who underwent a saline breast augmentation using 330 cc smooth round moderate plus implants (filled to 350 cc) placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 51

This patient is a 27 year old woman who desired larger breasts and underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 300 cc smooth round moderate plus profile implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery.

Case 52

This patient is a San Diego working mother who was interested in improving the changes that occurred to her breasts after pregnancy as well as mild preexisting breast asymmetry.  She underwent a breast augmentation with smooth round silicone implants: 325 cc moderate plus profile on the left and 300 cc moderate plus profile on the right. The implants were placed beneath the muscle and through an areolar incision.  She is seen one year out from her surgery.

Case 53

This patient is a 21 yo college student from the Los Angeles area who wanted to improve the overall shape, volume and moderate asymmetry of her breasts. She underwent the placement of a 371 cc moderate profile (style 15) implant on the left and a slightly smaller 339 cc moderate profile (style 15) on the right through an areolar incision with a small peri-areolar lift on the patients right side (left) and is seen here 3 months with improved overall symmetry and nipple position on the breast.

Case 54

This patient is a 25 year old woman who suffered from a constricted or “tuberous” breast deformity.  She underwent a silicone breast augmentation using 375 cc smooth round moderate plus profile implants placed under the muscle and through a breast crease incision.  She is seen here 6 months after surgery with a significant improvement in the shape and volume of her breast.

From Our Blog

Pros and Cons of Subglandular Placement of Breast Implants

June 13, 2014

When patients come in to see Dr. Vincent Marin for a consultation regarding a breast augmentation cosmetic procedure, he will go over all the steps for the procedure, what to expect afterward, as well as any special pre-surgical instructions. In addition, he will discuss options for silicone versus saline implants, the technique to insert the [...]

The Pros and Cons of the Transaxillary Breast Augmentation Approach

May 29, 2014

The possibility of excessive breast scarring is perhaps the biggest concern of patients who have opted to undergo a breast augmentation procedure. Since they have chosen to undergo this procedure to improve the appearance of the chest, any unsightly scars on the breasts will counter these efforts. Dr. Vincent Marin recommends that patients who are [...]

Areolar Breast Augmentation Technique

May 28, 2014

When it comes to breast augmentation, there are four ways in which the implant can be placed in the breast pocket. An incision can be made in the crease in the underside of the breast, in the armpit, in the belly button, or around the areola. The areolar incision approach is a popular option for [...]

The Pros and Cons of the Inframammary Breast Augmentation Technique

May 14, 2014

For women who have chosen to undergo a breast augmentation cosmetic surgical procedure, there may seem to be an endless number of choices to be made, from silicone versus saline implants, to implant size and profile, to placement in front or behind the pectoral muscle, to the incisional approach. These are all very important decisions [...]

Breast Augmentation Patient with Mild Nipple Asymmetry

February 25, 2014

The patient is a 24-year-old San Diego woman who came into the office wanting a breast augmentation. On examination, we noted that she had mild nipple asymmetry, which is very common in women. No two breasts are exactly the same. We discussed the augmentation with a small adjustment, a small lift on one side. This [...]