Pros and Cons of Subglandular Placement of Breast Implants

When patients come in to see Dr. Vincent Marin for a consultation regarding a breast augmentation cosmetic procedure, he will go over all the steps for the procedure, what to expect afterward, as well as any special pre-surgical instructions. In addition, he will discuss options for silicone versus saline implants, the technique to insert the implants, as well as the implant size and profile (the height versus circumference of the implants). He will also discuss whether the implants should be placed in front of the chest (pectoral) muscles, but behind the mammary glands (subglandular) or behind the chest muscles (submuscular). Each has its pros and cons, which are determined by the results that the patient wants, as well as their physical frame and skin thickness.

Pros to Subglandular Placement of Breast Implants

Perhaps the biggest advantage for subglandular implant placement is reduced pain during the immediate post-surgical period compared to submuscular placement. Furthermore, patients will have a faster recovery period and be able to see the final size and shape of the implants sooner than with submuscular implants.

In terms of which type of patient may be better suited to subglandular placement, Dr. Marin feels that women who already have somewhat large breasts will be better candidates, as there is already an adequate amount of breast tissue in place to fully cover the implants. Women with either excess skin or a small to moderate amount of breast droop may also be good candidates for subglandular placement.

Cons to Subglandular Placement of Breast Implants

The biggest disadvantage to subglandular placement of breast implants involve cases where there may not be enough skin and breast tissue to properly cover the implant. A good example of this would be patients with small breasts or thin skin. In such cases, the implants may be easier to both see and feel. Any rippling will be more visible with subglandular implants. The breasts will also have a more round, bubbled appearance, which some patients may not want.

Furthermore, subglandular implants carry a greater risk of capsular contracture, in which the scar tissue that naturally forms around the pocket into which the implants are placed becomes excessively thick and hard, causing the breasts to also have a hardened feel. This may also contribute to the implants having a higher risk of bottoming out, or shifting too far down on the chest, if the capsular contracture pushes the implants too far down. If a patient experiences capsular contracture from subglandular implants, Dr. Marin may have to do a second surgery to remove some of the excess scar tissue.

Each patient will have different needs. A subglandular placement may be best for one patient, while a submuscular placement may be the better choice for another patient. Dr. Marin will collaborate with the patient on which placement location will not only give them the look they want, but also reduce the risk of any complications at a later date.

To schedule a breast augmentation consultation, contact Marin Aesthetics today.

About the Author:

Dr. Vince Marin is a San Diego board-certified plastic surgeon specializes in cosmetic surgery of the face, nose, breast and body. If you wish to contact Dr. Marin, write to [email protected] or you can follow him on Twitter!