The Pros and Cons of the Transaxillary Breast Augmentation Approach

The possibility of excessive breast scarring is perhaps the biggest concern of patients who have opted to undergo a breast augmentation procedure. Since they have chosen to undergo this procedure to improve the appearance of the chest, any unsightly scars on the breasts will counter these efforts. Dr. Vincent Marin recommends that patients who are worried about scarring on the breasts themselves consider the transaxillary approach for inserting the breast implants.

What Is the Transaxillary Technique?

The transaxillary approach uses a small incision made in the natural fold of the armpit. A pathway to the breast is created, and a pocket is formed for the breast implant. The implant is then guided through the incision and placed into the pocket. Implants can be placed either in front of (subglandular) or behind (subpectoral) the pectoral (chest) muscles. The procedure is done either with the aid of an endoscope (a small camera mounted on a surgical instrument) to see where the implant should be placed, or “blind” without an endoscope. Either silicone or saline implants can be inserted by the transaxillary approach. If the implants are saline, they are inserted as an empty shell, and then filled with saline once they are properly positioned. Silicone implants can be inserted with this approach, but there are limitations as to the size of silicone implants that can be placed via this approach.

Pros of the Transaxillary Approach

Perhaps the biggest advantage of the transaxillary approach is that the incision scar is relatively small (1-2 cm) and hidden in the natural crease of the armpit.

A transaxillary approach also does not come in contact with the milk ducts, which means that patients will be able to successfully breastfeed following the procedure. It also will not affect nipple sensation, as none of the nerves are severed.

Cons of the Transaxillary Approach

Perhaps the biggest disadvantage of the transaxillary approach is that if a revision surgical procedure is needed, the transaxillary scar can’t be re-used. Instead, the incision must be made in the inframammary crease (the point at which the lower portion of the breast meets the chest wall). This will result in additional scarring.

Another con of the transaxillary approach is that it is not recommended for certain implants. Although silicone implants can be placed by the transaxillary approach, it is only feasible for smaller implants. Patients who select larger silicone implants are advised to opt for an inframammary crease approach.

In addition, the transaxillary approach results in less visibility when creating the implant pocket. Although a skilled plastic surgeon such as Dr. Marin can still produce beautiful and natural looking results even with this limited visibility, it is still considered a drawback.

Patients who have concerns about which approach is best suited for their individual needs can discuss their options with Dr. Marin. He has performed many implant surgeries using the transaxillary, areolar, and inframammary crease approach, and will help patients select the best surgical approach to use. Contact Marin Aesthetics to schedule your breast augmentation consultation today.

About the Author:

Dr. Vince Marin is a San Diego board-certified plastic surgeon specializes in cosmetic surgery of the face, nose, breast and body. If you wish to contact Dr. Marin, write to [email protected] or you can follow him on Twitter!